By Al Monitor
Saad Salloum
Members of various religious minorities in Iraq say they are worried that a possible US troop withdrawal could negatively affect the future diversity of the country.
Saad Salloum
Members of various religious minorities in Iraq say they are worried that a possible US troop withdrawal could negatively affect the future diversity of the country.
Yazidis and Christians said they are especially
concerned. In the wake of the victory over the Islamic State (IS),
Yazidi and Christian demands were a top priority for the Iraqi
government and were often taken on by the international community and
the UN Assistance Mission for Iraq. However, these demands no longer
command the same level of public and official interest.
Representatives of minorities were unhappy with the Jan. 5 parliamentary vote for the
United States to withdraw dismissed the opinions of minorities,
including Sunnis and Kurds, seeing it as a Shiite monopolization of
national decision-making.
These representatives say disputes between various
powerful groups will likely mean that the minorities will see their
territorial bases shrink, perhaps drastically; this may be particularly
the case in Sinjar and the Ninevah Valley, where the central government
and the Kurdistan Regional Government are fighting for influence. There
also is the matter of Turkish and Iranian interventions in
Iraq. Meanwhile, the US-Iranian conflict is raging, much of it along the
Iraqi-Syrian border,
even though Iranian Maj. Gen. Qasem Soleimani was killed by a US drone
at the Baghdad airport and US bases away from the border have been
targeted.
Amid the hubbub surrounding a US withdrawal, there is lack
of trust in the Iraqi government. Shiites constitute the largest
political grouping in the country, and Shiite elites have stuck with the
militias of the Popular Mobilization Units, which often have been in
competition with other sectors of society.
Iraqi minorities, because they have a weak demographic weight and
limited powers of self-protection, have resorted to the international
community — and notably to the United States — as an alternative to the
absence or ineffectiveness of the state.
Murad Ismail, executive director of the Yazda organization, said
Yazidis “support Iraq’s independence and its firm sovereignty over its
territories, but practically, we need international support in the
post-IS phase.”
Ismail said that in terms of economics, 95% of labor in the minority
areas comes from international support, while the efforts of the Iraqi
government are limited. Politically, the US government recognized the
Yazidi genocide, and the Yazidi issue has become an international
matter. This international recognition earned Yazidis a seat at the
table with the Iraqi government; it is likely that the remarkable
progress on the Yazidi issue would not have taken place if the matter
had been solely left up to the Iraqi government.
Ismail appeared alongside US President Donald Trump when Trump signed the Iraq and Syria Genocide Relief
and Accountability Act, which offered support to religious minority
victims in Iraq and Syria who suffered due to the IS genocide, acts
against humanity and crimes of war.
Ismail said, “We need billions of dollars to rebuild the
infrastructure in the destroyed areas of minorities and to provide
essential services. Without international support, we cannot build a
hospital to serve thousands of citizens, as we would like. If Iraq faces
the same fate as Iran in the sanctions, this would be the end of our
existence, and we would not find any hope to remain in Iraq or return to
it.” Trump has threatened severe sanctions against Iraq if US troops
are made to withdraw.
Minorities fear that if US troops leave the country and national
security institutions are unable to control the chaos, IS might make a
strong return and commit new genocides, and other terrorist groups in
Syria and Iraq might join the fray.
Since stability and the return of the displaced are key demands for
groups such as Christians in the Ninevah Valley and for Yazidis in
Sinjar, minorities want a continued US presence for security, military
and other reasons.
Mirza Dinnayi, head of Luftbrucke Irak (Air Bridge Iraq), said, “A
deep conflict is raging on the lands of minorities, especially in
Sinjar, which is a strategic location to control the borders with Syria.
As regional powers, Iran and Turkey are fighting over influence in the
region. Amid the weakness of the Iraqi government and the extent of
regional intervention, the international presence remains the best
option for minorities.”
Mona Yako, who teaches constitutional law at Salahuddin University in
Erbil, said any observer could see that the situation in Iraq is
worrisome, involving as it does security disorder, the ongoing protests
and the government 's resignation, among other issues. Declaring the
military eradication of IS did not reduce fears that IS sleeper cells
could redeploy. Under such a development, minorities likely would be the
first victims, as occurred in the Sinjar genocide of the summer of
2014.
Yako said, “The situation of Christians is delicate, and their
existence on their historical lands is threatened due to ongoing
migration. Any security vacuum would multiply the number of migrants and
lead to negative effects related to a reduced Christian presence.”
Although Iraqi citizens and minorities generally seek a stable
society and a sovereign state — the main demand of the public protests
that took off more than three months ago — ongoing support from a major
power with international weight such as the United States remains key
for minorities. The United States espouses democratic ideas and human
rights’ protection; Yako said minorities see this as a guarantee in case
their rights are violated.